![]() Back to Conference page
|
UICC World Cancer Congress 2006Bridging the Gap: Transforming Knowledge into ActionJuly 8-12, 2006, Washington, DC, USA |
Methods:Sixty-one histology-proved lung cancer patients treated consecutively in our institution from December 2004 to May 2005 were studied. There were 12 females and 49 males with a median age of 58 years (ranged 23-76 years). All patients received conventional fractionated thoracic irradiation and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Chemo-regimen consisted of NP and EP. Radiation dose ranged from 50 - 70 Gy. Dosimetric metrics as (Dmax), mean dose (Dmean), V10, V20, V30, V40 and V50 of the esophagus were generated. In univariate analysis, various dosimetric and patient-specific (age, gender, smoking history) parameters were studied. Logistic step-wise regression analysis was used to determine significant predictors to CTCAE 3.0 Grade 問 2 acute esophagitis.
Results:Forty-one Of 61 (67%) patients developed CTCAE 3.0 Grade 問 2 acute esophagitis. The most statistically significant single parameter for predicting acute esophagitis was mean dose of the esophagus (p = 0.008). Maximum dose of the esophagus and V40 had marginal significance correlating with acute esophagitis, p = 0.052 and 0.069, respectively. Age, gender, smoking history (ever vs. none) and other metrics had no statistically significant influence on the incidence of acute esophagitis (p = 0.08 每 0.81). On logistic regression analysis, only mean dose remained significantly correlated with Grade 問 2 acute esophagitis, p = 0.0345. Conclusions: The single best predictor for CTCAE 3.0 Grade 問 2 acute esophagitis was mean dose of the esophagus in this group of patients.
See more of Cancer Research, Detection and Treatment
See more of Cancer Research, Detection and Treatment
See more of The UICC World Cancer Congress 2006
