Congress logo
Back to Conference page

The 13th World Conference on Tobacco OR Health

Building capacity for a tobacco-free world

July 12-15, 2006, Washington, DC, USA



Thursday, July 13, 2006 - 1:45 PM
24-2

Improving Smoking Cessation Services in Community Pharmacy

David A. Edwards, BEd, MPH1, Andrew Gilbert, Professor2, Debra Rowett, BPharm3, Grant Kardachi, BPharm4, and Robyn Vial, MAppSci(Pharm)3. (1) QuitSA, The Cancer Council South Australia, 202 Greenhill Road, Eastwood, Australia, (2) School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Australia, (3) Drug and Theraputics Information Service, Repatriation General Hospital, Daws Road, Daw Park, Australia, (4) Pharmaceutical Society of Australia (SA Branch), 109 Greenhill Road, Unley, Australia

Objective: Investigate the effectiveness of a multi-faceted practice support program (based on evidence from organisational change and implementation literature) to implement the 5As as a standard operating procedure for smoking cessation in community pharmacy.

Methods: A randomised controlled trial methodology was used involving 81 community pharmacies in South Australia. Over 400 pharmacy staff completed baseline measures including self-reported activity, knowledge, confidence and barriers. Following randomisation, 41 intervention pharmacies undertook the support program including; workshop, academic detailing, mystery shopping and staff meetings. Baseline measures were repeated at study completion and outcome indicators such as faxed referrals to Quitline were recorded.

Results: Intervention pharmacies outperformed the control group on the majority of measures associated with application of the 5As. Eighteen intervention pharmacies (49%) referred 107 smokers into support programs. Control group pharmacies did not refer any smokers to comparable support programs. Intervention staff reported significantly higher levels of confidence (M = 3.2, SD = .83 vs control group M = 3.0, SD = .82, p < .05) and knowledge (M = 3.3, SD = .81 vs control group M = 3.0, SD = .82, p < .05) post intervention. However, a number of system and practitioner barriers remained of high importance including time and financial incentives.A systematic, evidence based approach to implementation has demonstrated significant practice change. Remaining barriers demonstrate a need for ongoing support at the practice and policy level.